The ‘Madness’ of Mercy – Pope Francis

The ‘Madness’ of Mercy

What’s at the Center of Francis’s Papacy?

When Hannah Arendt reviewed Pope John XXIII’s journals just over fifty years ago, she shared a question posed to her by a Roman chambermaid not long after he had died. “Madam,” the woman said, “this pope was a real Christian. How could that be? And how could it happen that a true Christian would sit on St. Peter’s chair?” Arendt took the comments to underscore the tension between the radical simplicity of Jesus’ call to “follow me” and the demands of the institutional church. After all, as the future pope scribbled in his notebook when he was only eighteen years old, taking that call seriously put one at risk of being “treated as a madman.”

Pope Francis, who declared John XXIII a saint and whose own pontificate draws frequent comparisons with that earlier pope, surely understands the truth of that observation. Francis has been described in similarly unfavorable terms by his critics; some have even compared him to a real madman, president-elect Donald Trump. And even a few of his admirers, especially in the mainstream press, sometimes seem disturbed by his words and deeds, surprised by a pope who seems not only to believe but to act as though the meek really will inherit the earth. Depending on the newspaper or magazine one reads, Francis is either too reckless or too conservative, a possible heretic or a false hope. His off-the-cuff pronouncements reliably stir controversy; his openness to reform generates theological sparring and debate. Meanwhile, the usual swirl of Vatican gossip and intrigue continues apace.

In the midst of all this, one could be forgiven for not remembering that Francis himself has told us what is at the center of his papacy, the thread that holds it all together: mercy. He took as his episcopal motto miserando atque eligendo—“by having mercy and choosing.” His apostolic exhortation, Evangelii gaudium, urges us never to stop seeking God’s forgiveness, never to despair of being beyond the reach of God’s mercy. And last year, Francis called an extraordinary jubilee—the Year of Mercy—which has just come to a close. The message could not be less subtle. It is worth stopping to reflect on what Francis has described as “the very foundation of the church’s life,” now, while the Year of Mercy remains fresh in our minds and Christmas is upon us.

We shouldn’t be surprised that such an emphasis on mercy has been misunderstood, willfully or otherwise, and left more than one of the church’s factions dissatisfied. Against a stringent conservatism, dwelling on mercy appears as a kind of antinomianism: a breakdown of rules and order in favor of freewheeling forgiveness, a weakening of morals and a soft-peddling of ethical demands. Against the more thinned-out versions of religious liberalism, it can seem too “existential,” too focused on the darker currents of our lives—the “wounds” we suffer from, which need to be healed. And while mercy should be joined to hope, it is neither naïvely optimistic nor ideologically progressive. It is costly love in the midst of pain and grief, not false cheer.

Mercy for Francis is never simply a matter for individuals, a kind of privatized consolation or a form of cheap grace. He wants nothing less than to build a “culture of mercy.” This can be seen vividly in the way Francis has asked us to understand Laudato si’: not as an encyclical that merely endorsed the scientific consensus on climate change, but as a call to conversion in how we relate to the resources we all share. “The object of mercy is human life itself and everything it embraces,” the pope reminds us. That includes our stewardship of creation, leading Francis to suggest “a complement” to the traditional sets of seven corporal and seven spiritual works of mercy. “May the works of mercy also include care for our common home,” he said in September, going on to demand that we “break with the logic of violence, exploitation and selfishness” that afflicts our political and economic life and make mercy itself “felt in every action that seeks to build a better world.”

As the church struggles with its own divisions, and as the United States and the world enter dark political times, Francis’s message of mercy should be a light to our path. He has staked his papacy on that message, offering it as the only answer to our deepest questions and longings. In a world that “leaves so many men and women behind as it races on, breathlessly and aimlessly,” he recently said, “we need the oxygen of this gratuitous and life-giving love. We thirst for mercy and no technology can quench that thirst. We seek a love that endures beyond momentary pleasures, a safe harbor where we can end our restless wanderings, an infinite embrace that forgives and reconciles.”

The jubilee may be over now, but the need for mercy never ends. Neither does God’s offer of it. That should be at the heart of our attempts to understand this pope—and the source of our hope in the difficult days that may lie ahead.


‘COMMONWEAL’, the U.S. Roman Catholic publication, deserves to be read for its open discussion of contemporary theological views with the Church in the world of today. The following link gives links to articles about The Church and Same-Sex Relationships which is well worth reading:

Father Ron Smith, Christchurch, New Zealand

About kiwianglo

Retired Anglican priest, living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Ardent supporter of LGBT Community, and blogger on 'Thinking Anglicans UK' site. Theology: liberal, Anglo-Catholic & traditional. regarding each person as a unique expression of Christ, and therefore lovable.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The ‘Madness’ of Mercy – Pope Francis

  1. murraysmallbone says:

    If one thinks about God’s Mercy as Pope
    Francis interprets it,I can see his vision that even in the presence of the most heinous evil that God is present to it.
    Surely this is the true understanding of salvation through Jesus Christ Our Lord.So that all that happens good and bad in this world is encompassed by the love of God as found in the life of His Son.
    Such a view hinges on what image we have built of God.Those in the Roman Curia and elsewhere in the Christ confessing world who are not able to share the insights of Pope Francis would offer counter arguments substantively,but in reality their image of God is at variance with that of Pope Francis.What we think of God is not necessarily what the Reality of God is.
    At the centre of Christianity is the story of love’s mending wounded hearts.

    Jesu mercy! Mary pray!

  2. kiwianglo says:

    Indeed, Murray. God loves everything God has created. The Cross was for the salvation of ALL.

  3. Philip Almond says:

    What about all the New Testament references to the wrath of God? What about what Jesus said to the ones on his left hand? What about his reply to the foolish virgins’ “Lord, Lord, open to us” – “Truly I say to you, I know you not”? What about Matthew 7:21-23? What about Revelation 20:15?
    Phil Almond

  4. Philip Almond says:

    Father Ron, I hope you don’t mind my putting this response to your Thinking Anglicans post here, as TA seem disinclined to put my posts up.
    Response to Father Ron Smith (Thinking Anglicans, Monday, 19 December 2016 at 8:24pm GMT): Con/evos, including Andrew Goddard, agree wholeheartedly that God sincerely and genuinely invites, commands, entreats, exhorts all sinners (and we are all sinners) to submit to Christ in repentance, faith, love, obedience and fear. That is the first step in the process of Salvation. But the process does not end there. As justified sinners we are all called to live holy lives acceptable and pleasing to God. That is where the sexuality disagreement comes in. My view is:
    The present realities of faithful, loving Christian heterosexual sexual married relationships are acceptable to God (following the Westminster Confession ‘Of Good Works’, item VI. ‘Notwithstanding, the persons of believers being accepted through Christ, their good works also are accepted in Him; not as though they were in this life wholly unblamable and unreproveable in God’s sight; but that He, looking upon them in His Son, is pleased to accept and reward that which is sincere, although accompanied with many weaknesses and imperfections’), whereas faithful, loving Christian homosexual sexual relationships are not acceptable to God.
    Phil Almond

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.