Worship – OR – Entertainment

Flickr: Fr. Lawrence Lew, O.P.
I was speaking recently with an evangelical friend who described how, at his large, affluent Presbyterian Church, the current pastor is pushing the vision that the church service should be designed with the outsider in mind. “Seeker”-friendly church is hardly a new concept, but it is obviously becoming more pervasive, since it has spread even to the mainline churches.The theological or biblical rationale for this approach is that Jesus went and met people where they were. Christ’s meeting with the Samaritan woman may be the supreme example. He doesn’t browbeat her for her immorality and her misguided religious notions. He does make a number of important truth statements — God is Spirit — but he does so in the context of their established conversation. Even in addressing her personal life, his tone does not express moral outrage. If it was intended to induce any shame, its only purpose was so that she would know her life had been put in the light of the Lord, in which forgiveness was already on hand before it was even sought.

Creative individuals who have been trying to apply this model to the activity of the Church see our Lord’s encounters with individuals like the Samaritan woman as a paradigm for churches today. Build relationships and community with individuals, and then within that loving relationship the truth of the gospel can be shared. As such, the goal of the Church should really be to get outsiders through the church door so that those relationships can be established and that community can be nurtured.

Such a model for church is perhaps evident in the way Jesus relates to those whom he encounters, but it is very difficult to reconcile it with the remainder of the New Testament and the Acts of the Apostles in particular. Paul did not go from town to town in Asia Minor devising brands and constructing attractional communities. Rather, he and the other apostles are seen proclaiming the truth of God in the death and resurrection of Christ. Their primary goal was not increasing the rolls but, out of a sense of obedience to God, preaching the gospel to the nations.

Such seeker-friendly churches can engage in practices that border on the absurd. Smoke machines, rock bands, and internet churches are today commonplace. Recently I came across the “Cover Songs” from a worship band at a church in Colorado. Their Sunday morning renditions of Led Zepplin’s “Stairway to Heaven” and Bruno Mars’s “Uptown Funk” speak for themselves. Though I found it difficult to pick the worst example, the following cover struck me as particularly cruel because it celebrates a level of worldly success that many of the lost and wounded souls for whom we care will never know

My argument will hardly be controversial to the average Episcopalian or Anglican. Our typical reaction to such extremes is scorn and derision. Our reactive reasoning might fall along these lines: “Church should not be mere entertainment — we’re trying to educate, illuminate, and transform people. As such our worship is not designed to be attractional, but to cater to the spiritual needs of our congregation.” For many of the congregations in my current diocese (New Jersey), most are looking at simply maintaining what they have by meeting the spiritual and communal needs of their members.

Such a view of the purpose of worship — supplying a need of the members — is all too common. It could be said that in the Episcopal Church, in its various liturgical and theological expressions, specializes in boutique congregations that cater to their members’ needs, desires, and (dare I say) prejudices. We’re really not expecting that all or even many would want to come to our churches, but for the ones who can appreciate such things as high-brow music, progressive preaching, or traditional liturgy, we have the church for you. It’s easy to pick on the so-called attractional churches, but the alternate view of the church and worship hits closer to home and is likely to threaten cherished idols.

Both formulations of the purpose and design of Sunday worship are deficient because both are anthropocentric. One view says that the Church ought to be designed to appeal to the unchurched, while the other argues that the Church ought to minister to the faithful. In both cases, the starting point involves meeting the perceived needs of a chosen demographic. Like the catechism of the current prayer book, we (unhelpfully) start with the doctrine of anthropology.

While I think there is place to consider how we might welcome outsiders into loving Christian community where the gospel is proclaimed, and while we need to weigh how what we do (or don’t do) feeds and ministers to the body of Christ in a local congregation, we would be better served if we started from a theocentric position. Worship — on Sunday or otherwise — is for God and his glory, not because God needs our praises or is imperfect in himself but because he has made us the priests of all creation to return in praise and thanksgiving and sacrifice what he has given to us.

My current parish has maintained for over 100 years a noble custom that may not provide definite proof of a theocentric attitude toward worship, but it at least suggests a different framework. In our parish, every memorial dedication — whether on the stained glass, Eucharistic vessels, or vestments — contains the abbreviation A.M.D.G.: Latin for ad majorem dei gloriam, to the greater glory of God.

Please don’t imagine that I am claiming our congregation offers a sterling example of theocentric worship. But like many older congregations, it has vestiges of that older rationale, which I am arguing we need to reclaim and recover. If our worship is truly vertically founded and vertically inclined, for the greater glory of God — not as a ploy of entertainment or the lure of a boutique — I believe it will both draw in those who are called and are seeking the truth of God, and will minister to the faithful. For what they need is not more entertaining preaching or better music, but preaching and music that lifts them to God and puts their hand in the hand of the Master.

______________________________________________________________

This Article – from ‘Living Church’ in the United States – reminds us of the primary purpose of Christian worship: the expression of adoration and thankfulness to the God who created us and all things. In fact, the Institution of the Eucharist (a word which means: ‘Thanksgiving’) by Jesus Christ himself was the beginning of a new paradigm of worship of God that centres around our human appreciation of our redemption through the life-giving sacrificial action of God-in-Christ.

In the Churches’ efforts to become more acceptable in a largely unbelieving world, we may have made the mistake of ‘dumbing down’ our communal worship by catering to the less esoteric qualities of the ever changing culture of popularity – the pop-culture of our day. The prevalence of pop-band music in parish worship is sometimes even seen as a preferred alternative to as a celebration of the Eucharist – which we mistakenly claim as being more in tune with the needs of modern youth.

In the struggle to become ‘relevant’ to what we see as the current youth culture, we even provide ‘Rock Masses’, which – devoid of any semblance of decorum in celebration – are thought to be more inspiring of the ‘good vibes’ thought to be a necessary ingredient of authentic youth participation in the worship of the Living God.

What the author of this article, Father Jonathan Mitchican of The U.S. Episcopal Church (TEC), is advocating is a return to some more traditional understanding of what worship is really all about. It is not primarily entertainment, but rather, a time of close connection with one another in the presence of the Eternal God who made us, and who has redeemed us from the effects of our human faults and failings. 

True worship is thanksgiving for the fact that we are alive and able to enjoy the Creation that God brought into being in and for every one of us.

 

Christ is Risen, Alleluia. He is Risen indeed, Alleluia, Alleluia!

Father Ron Smith, Christchurch, New Zealand

Advertisements

About kiwianglo

Retired Anglican priest, living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Ardent supporter of LGBT Community, and blogger on 'Thinking Anglicans UK' site. Theology: liberal, Anglo-Catholic & traditional. regarding each person as a unique expression of Christ, and therefore lovable.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Worship – OR – Entertainment

  1. John Marshall says:

    Thank you for this, Fr Ron. Having from time to time contributed to The Living Church, I am almost tempted to send them a postscript.
    I went to a funeral on Saturday afternoon, of my former bishop, Michael Perham. Gloucester Cathedral was packed for an Eastertide Eucharist. Alleluias abounded. We sang traditional hymns, the confession was from Taize, the Sanctus and Agnus Dei were from Schubert’s Mass in G. Psalm 43 was sung to Anglican chant by a disciplined choir. The air was filled with incense, holy water was sprinkled. It was in a sense, eminently counter-cultural. But everyone I have spoken to was bowled over by the sense of the presence of the angels and saints to whom we commended Michael. Our worship was a glimpse of the heaven in which we say we believe.
    It simply isn’t about attracting people in by giving them a diet of the world’s culture set to holy words: it is about offering a glimpse of the eternal, of lifting people even for a split second above the world which surrounds us to the eternal, the enduring, and to share in the eternal worship of heaven. It doesn’t have to be Schubert or Palestrina: modern music can do it too, and a guitar as well as a 4 manual Nicholson (I choose that in honour of Auckland Cathedral!). Worship lifts us up. If it doesn’t it isn’t worship. And if it merely entertains it passes like the incense smoke (of which there was no trace in the air by Sunday morning)

  2. kiwianglo says:

    Thanks, John, for your response to my comments. We obviously haver a common mind as to what constitutes true worship. We sometimes struggle here, in ACANZP, to get across to clergy the absolute value of regular celebration of the Eucharist.

    We, at St.Michael & All Angels in Christchurch, New Zealand, have continued our Anglo-Catholic tradition for 150 years, with Daily Mass as the heart of our outreach in the parish. As a former Franciscan, and now a priest, I am kept alive (at 87) by my own regular participation in the provision of the D.M., and can vouch for its relevance for the constant renewal it provides for active ministry in the Church. We also still have Choral Evensong and Benediction on 3 Sundays a month, with Taize on the 4th Sunday.

    Nice to hear about the Mass for your Bishop, Michael Perham. I’m sure the inspiration you all experienced was a part of the fruits of his labours in the vineyard. We need more like him – and you – in the Church to keep up the sense of God’s holiness as we enter into His Presence.

    All Joy and Peace to you and yours,
    Fr. Ron

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s