FOCANZ Bishop on’Way Forward’ Group

Key working group named

Their task: to find a structure that allows Anglicans with opposing convictions on same-gender blessings to live together.

TAONGA NEWS   |  26 OCT 2016  |  1 COMMENT

The group charged with identifying “structural arrangements” to allow the church to hold all those with differing convictions on blessing same-gender relationships has today been named.

Its members are: Rt Rev Richard Ellena (Bishop of Nelson); Mrs Jackie Pearse (a former General Secretary of this Church); Rev Learne McGrath (Vicar of Massey, Auckland); Mr Jeremy Johnson (Chancellor of the Diocese of Christchurch); Mr Fei Tevi (Diocese of Polynesia) and Rev Katene Eruera (Dean Tikanga Maori St John’s College)

Last May’s Napier General Synod passed Motion 29 – which tabled the ‘A Way Forward’ report until the 2018 General Synod “with a firm expectation that a decision to move forward will be made then.”

Motion 29 also charged the Primates with setting up another working group with a tightly-focussed mandate to identify “structural arrangements within our Three-Tikanga Church to safeguard both theological convictions concerning the blessing of same gender relationships” .

Because the Primates were soon inundated with submissions about what these arrangements should be – and who should be on the working group – they recommended a two-tier approach to July’s General Synod Standing Committee meeting in Samoa:

1. A small – six-member maximum – working group with responsibility for “facilitating the process to develop possible structural mechanisms” for discussion across the Church, and ultimately for bringing these to the 2018 General Synod.

2. A panel of consultants made up of people identified by the various interested parties (eg Affirm, FoCA, Changing Attitudes, LGBTI, young people, legal advisers etc). The members of this panel would serve as a point of contact for the working group with their constituency, and would consult with their constituency.

It’s the composition of that small working group which has been announced today.

In a letter to the church today, the Primates say they have been humbled by meeting the many groups and individuals who have sought to discuss these issues with them:

“What has stood out,” they say, “is the grace, the compassion and the goodwill reflected in these discussions. A very high proportion of those who have spoken with us are so clearly genuinely seeking to step into the shoes of those they disagree with.

“There is a clear determination to come around the table and work for mechanisms that allow us to move forward together in mission without minimising or denying our differences.”

Because the Primates received “a significant number” of submissions for the Working Group to consider, they hope they will be able to stick to the timetable they announced in a letter to the church in June. This said, in part:

“The Working Group will consider each suggestion and may also identify other possibilities. The Working Group will provide feedback to proposers and to the wider Church by the end of January 2017.

“The Working Group will finalise a proposal (or set of proposals) for the consideration of the Church by the 1 July 2017 date asked for by General Synod 2016.

_________________________________________________________________

While one can welcome the setting up of a Working Group of 6 people to consider a set of proposals to put before the 2018 General Synod of ACANZP to enable a proposed ‘Way Forward’ for our Church to implement a way of recognising Same-Sex blessings; one cannot but wonder why the list should be headed by a Bishop who is known to be actively against such recognition in and by our Church.

+Richard Ellena, Bishop of Nelson, is known to have participated in at least one meeting of GAFCON, the body in the world-wide Anglican Communion that has set up alternative jurisdictions in the territories of North American Churches that have created local schism from TEC and the Anglican Church of Canada. GAFCON now has its own representation (GAFCON UK) in England set up directly to oppose the Church of England’s inclusion of celibate Gay Clergy in its ministry and mission.

Granted that there could – or maybe even should – be included in this Working Group people who are concerned about any change of doctrine involved in the inclusion of pro-LGBTI provisions in the ‘Way Forward’ legislation; but to have a known active GAFCON supporter who is also a bishop of our Church likely to be a prime mover in the group – would seem to me at least to be counter-productive of any forward movement.

I feel that the episcopal voice on this small group might rather have been someone not so stridently against any ‘movement forward’ on the issue, or should at least be known to be ‘neutral’. Who, in this group, is going to be brave enough to gainsay the leadership role of a bishop of the Church?

Father Ron Smith, Christchurch, New Zealand

 

Advertisements

About kiwianglo

Retired Anglican priest, living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Ardent supporter of LGBT Community, and blogger on 'Thinking Anglicans UK' site. Theology: liberal, Anglo-Catholic & traditional. regarding each person as a unique expression of Christ, and therefore lovable.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to FOCANZ Bishop on’Way Forward’ Group

  1. Brian Ralph says:

    I agree wholeheartedly. I know nothing about the other members but the Bishop of Nelson is the last person I would want to see on such a panel. I hope the others can stand up to his obvious bigotry. No wonder I no longer want to even enter a church. Even the Rugby Union groups are more tolerant these days.

  2. kiwianglo says:

    Dear Brian, you’d better move up to Christchurch. We would welcome you at St.Michael & All Angels. We are in tune with the God of Love in Christ. Have a Blessed All Saints Day. Fr.Ron

  3. Peter Carrell says:

    Dear Ron, I counsel you to rapidly revise your unfounded statements about Bishop Richard Ellena before I lay a formal complaint wth the church authorities. You must not use false statements to impugn the reputation of your colleagues in ministry. Start with checking whether Bishop Richard has ever absented himself from Lambeth. You have 48 hours to withdraw or correct your unfounded statements otherwise I will draw attention to these unfounded statements.

  4. kiwianglo says:

    My understanding was that Bishop Ellena has attended at least one meeting of GAFCON/FOCA. Are you saying that my information is incorrect? I have withdrawn reference to Lambeth. Does that satisfy your demand for retraction of presumed mis-information? Please let me know so that I can meet your request for a more up-to-date posting – in time to meet your deadline.

  5. Peter Carrell says:

    Dear Ron
    I think it is true that Bishop Richard participated in one FCA consultation but personally I commend always providing a link to a published article as evidence for such claims. My general point about Bishop Richard, having talked with him on a number of occasions about these matters, is that associating him with FCA creates an impression that his personal views are FCA’s views. His views are his own and they are best assessed according to his own published statements not by assuming his views are FCA’s views. What I can assure you and readers here is that Bishop Richard is committed to finding a unified way forward for our church.
    I thank you for the corrections you have made to your original statement.
    With kind regards
    Peter

  6. kiwianglo says:

    Dear Peter, thank you for your update.
    Without extending this conversation too far; I draw your attention to Bishop Ellena’s details on the internet search site which records his 2 attendances at GAFCON Meetings overseas. On the Lambeth issue; I believed that, at the time, Bishop Ellena had withdrawn early from a Lambeth Conference – together with the GAFCON Bishops, but maybe I was mistaken – a fact that I have now acknowledged on my web-site by deleting that reference. My intention is never to pillory anyone for their beliefs. Only to alert our Church as to the need for the assurance of an unbiased provenance of those it installs on executive bodies.
    Agape, Ron

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: