LGB&TI Anglican Coalition Response to the House of Bishops

Sunday, 16 February 2014

Press Release

The LGB&TI Anglican Coalition is appalled by the House of Bishops’ recently-issued Pastoral Guidance on Same Sex Marriage, especially in the light of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s presidential address in which it was stated that differing views should be accepted in a spirit of ‘good disagreement’. In this document we see no acceptance of disagreement at all, but instead a heavy-handed and legalistic imposition of discipline.

The new guidance emphasises the well-known fact that same-sex couples will not be able to marry in Church of England churches even when equal marriage takes effect. Furthermore, despite the recommendation of the Pilling Report, the prohibition on blessing same-sex couples is reinforced. While these iron exclusions are in place it is simply ludicrous to speak of the Church ‘Welcoming’ lesbian, gay bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGB&TI) people, or to pretend that this statement is in any sense ‘pastoral’.

The guidance also excludes people married to members of the same sex from ordination, and forbids LGB&TI clergy to marry same-sex partners. This is cruel and unjust to clergy who have faithfully served the church, hitherto with the full knowledge and support of their bishops, and it will impoverish the ministry by driving away LGB&TI ordinands. Only those who are prepared to lie will remain.

The statement was made without any consultation with openly gay people, and fails to acknowledge that some of the bishops who are signatories are understood to be gay themselves. This heightens the corrosive sense of hypocrisy and cynicism with which this issue is surrounded in the Church.

We are aware that the position taken in this statement was partly or even mainly driven by fears about the unity of the Anglican Communion, and that bishops who wished to take a less harsh line were told that the Communion would not stand for it. In some large African provinces which are threatening to secede over this issue the Anglican Church helps supply the theology which backs the violent persecution of LGB&TI people. We believe that it is simply immoral for the Church of England to appease these provinces by sacrificing the rights and freedoms of LGB&TI people in this country or any other, or to place the cause of institutional unity above the cause of justice and humanity.

This guidance is wrong in tone and content, and will further damage the Church’s mission, not only to LGB&TI people, but to all people of goodwill who respect justice and truth. It may seek to carry disciplinary authority, but it has no moral authority and cannot command respect. We hope and pray that it will be swiftly withdrawn.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Sunday, 16 February 2014


Thanks again to Simon Sarmiento, of ‘Thinking Anglicans’, for this access to the press release from the LGBTI community in response to the latest statement made by the Church of England House of Bishops after the revelation of the Pilling Report.

One immediate negative response to the Pilling Report, contained in the H.o.B. statement, is the fact that there will still be no official Church Blessings on Same-Sex Partnerships – even without the couple resorting to Same-Sex Marriage allowed by the State. For the Church to deny its blessing when a couple makes a public commitment to a monogamous faithful relationships is a definite denial of the sacredness of any Same-Sex partnership – whether celibate or not.

Further, the problems that may arise from Same-Sex Marriage becoming legal in England and Wales next month, when even one of the 39 Articles of Religion states that no clergy-person may be denied the connubial benefits of Marriage according to the Law of the Land, could be substantial – and highly  embarrassing for the Church of England.

It seems that heterosexual clergy may enjoy the connubial joys of marriage – but this is not for homosexual people, who must remain celibate!

What must inevitably proceed from this latest determination on the part of the H.o.B. is the questioning of the validity of Church Law when it intentionally contravenes Civil Law – in a situation where common human rights are at stake. Arising from this conundrum is another question, how seriously does the C. of E. take its commitment to ’embrace’ LGBTI people in its fellowship, while at the same time excluding them from a facility available to them in the civil sphere?

Father Ron Smith, Christchurch, New Zealand

About kiwianglo

Retired Anglican priest, living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Ardent supporter of LGBT Community, and blogger on 'Thinking Anglicans UK' site. Theology: liberal, Anglo-Catholic & traditional. regarding each person as a unique expression of Christ, and therefore lovable.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to LGB&TI Anglican Coalition Response to the House of Bishops

  1. Pingback: CoE Bishops’ Statement on UK Same Sex Marriage – Not Truly “Pastoral” | Centre for the Study of Christianity and Sexuality

  2. murraysmallbone says:

    Yes Fr. Ron, a loud applause to your comments herein.
    I had forgotten abut Article of Religion xxxii on the marriage of priests.
    As I previously commented on Article xxvi (Unworthiness of Ministers) previously in this conversation;I suppose the H.o B could stoop to using Art. xxvi in defence of their prohibitions.
    As I understand it in England the Canon Law of the C.of E is the law of the land, but then so also is the new right of marriage for same -sex couples;so a legal conundrum is now in place.
    Given English Church history and the injustice of the HoB’s directions there will be Daniels who dare to enter the lion’s den.
    Personally I would have no problem in receiving the sacraments from a married/samesex priest or bishop as the guarantee is Our Lord’s guarantee.A great shame that future ordinands would be put in a double bind situation;we are short enough already of ordinands.I personally do not want what I call a “White picket fence theology”in the Church.For me a White picket fence theology is my name for fundamentalist theologies.We need a way forward.It will not be long before an English congregation seek Episcopal oversight from A TEC bishop;Another possible strand in the Anglican rainbow.What drama would ensue from such a move.!!!
    Perhaps Our Lord’s command of “ut unum sint” means that we are to live in Him and not seeking disunity among ourselves which is based always on “The Them”;picking up on the recent sermon by the Provost of Glasgow cathedral.

    Jesu mercy. Mary pray.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.