Conservative accuses General Synod of Lies re Women Bishops

Women Bishops: it’s now clear that the General Synod has lied to Parliament and the Church
Women bishops are coming, and there’s no protection for traditionalists

By Peter Mullen
THE TELEGRAPH
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/
November 29th, 2011

The Archbishop of Canterbury, appearing before a parliamentary committee of the House of Lords, urges that, once women are consecrated as bishops – he is confident of their acceptance being voted by the General Synod – they should be fast-tracked to membership of the House. So real bishops – I mean male bishops – who have served in the episcopate for years will be sidelined by the incoming women.

Isn’t this what we used to call discrimination?

In 2010 the General Synod confirmed its determination to proceed to the consecration of women bishops. Disconcertingly, the resolution does not include any proposal to provide statutory provision for those who in conscience cannot accept women’s episcopacy. So the benign genius of Dr John Habgood, when Archbishop of York, which offered the notion of two integrities at the time when women priests were originally approved by the General Synod, has now been overthrown. The latest synodical resolution will also abolish the roles of the Provincial Episcopal Visitors – the so called flying bishops – created in 1993 to provide pastoral oversight for those conscientiously unable to accept the priesthood of women.

Thus, as John Broadhurst, former Bishop of Fulham, said on Radio Four when the inadequate synodical resolution passed: The Synod has lied to Parliament and it has lied to the Church.

We must understand clearly what the new draft measure amounts to. It is a plain denial that those unable to accept women priests or bishops have any integrity at all. Dr Habgood’s agreeable compromise has been arbitrarily done away with and now, by implication, there is only one integrity in the Church and it belongs exclusively to the supporters of women priests and bishops. But synodical approval for women priests was obtained in 1992 on the proviso that alternative pastoral arrangements be made for those opposed. It was this which ensured that women’s ordination became a reality, for it is very likely that many members of Synod would have rejected the innovation if the safeguard of the flying bishops, providing alternative pastoral oversight, had not been forthcoming.

Dr Williams should not count his chickens. It is still not too late to hope that this manifest injustice to conscientious dissenters from the consecration of women bishops will so stick in the craw of all but the most hardened feminist apparatchiks in the Synod that they will vote the measure down.

The Rev Dr Peter Mullen is Rector of St Michael, Cornhill and St Sepulchre-without-Newgate in the City of London

 _______________________________________________________________________________________
This report from ‘The Telegraph’, by the Revd. Peter Mullen, betrays his dismissive attitude towards the prospect of Women Bishops in the Church of England – see this derisive statement:
” real bishops – I mean male bishops – who have served in the episcopate for years will be sidelined by the incoming women.”
To examine this remark a bit more closley: one wonders how, and in what way, will the ordination of women as bishops ‘sideline’ those male bishops who have served in the episcopate for years? Some may be disappointed, perhaps, but side-lined, No! Bishops are bishops, and in the House of Bishops in the Church of England, the only difference in authority between them (perhaps anachronistically so, in this day and age) is that some of them are given seats in the House of Lords, by virtue of the prominence of their historical Sees.
Mullen’s charge of General Synod ‘lying to Parliament and the Church’ is, to say the least, a little mischievous, and derogatory towards the Archbishop of Canterbury, by reason of  his recent suggestion  in the House of Lords – on the fact that the Church of England (via it’s diocesan synods) has already shown it’s support for the Ordination of Women Bishops.
I suspect that the Archbishop’s assertion that the Measure that will most likely be put before Parliament  – in the event of General Synod’s approval – and that the Women Bishops so ordained should be welcomed into the House of Lords (where qualified) – has deeply offended those conservatives in the Church of England (like Mr.Mullen) who refuse to accept the ministry of women in the Church.
Father Ron Smith, Christchurch, New Zealand

About kiwianglo

Retired Anglican priest, living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Ardent supporter of LGBT Community, and blogger on 'Thinking Anglicans UK' site. Theology: liberal, Anglo-Catholic & traditional. regarding each person as a unique expression of Christ, and therefore lovable.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.